Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Stats26 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Stats26 - Essay Example The results of a two-factor analysis of variance produce df = 1, 28 for the F-ratio for factor A, df = 2, 28 for the F-ratio for factor B, and df = 2, 28 for the AÃâ€" B interaction. Based on this information, what is the total number of different treatment conditions that were compared in the study? In a line graph showing the results from a two-factor experiment, the levels of factor B are presented on the X-axis and the line for A1 is consistently 5 points higher than the line for A2. What result is indicated by this pattern? A two-factor study with two levels of factor A and three levels of factor B uses a separate group of n = 5 participants in each treatment condition. How many participants are needed for the entire study? If the mean and variance are computed for each sample in an independent-measures two-factor experiment, then which of the following types of sample data will tend to produce large F-ratios for the two-factor ANOVA? The following data represent the means for each treatment condition in a two-factor experiment. Note that one mean is not given. What value of the missing mean will result in no main effect for factor A? The following data represent the means for each treatment condition in a two-factor experiment. Note that one mean is not given. What value of the missing mean will result in no main effect for factor B? 1. The results from a two-factor experiment can be presented in a matrix with the levels of factor A forming the rows and the levels of factor B forming the columns, with a separate sample in each of the matrix cells. Using this matrix structure, describe the null hypothesis for each of the three F-ratios computed in the two-factor analysis. (3) A X B-interaction: The null hypothesis is that there is no interaction between factors A and B. All the mean differences between treatment conditions are explained by the main effects of the two factors. 3. The following table summarizes the results of a

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Why people behave the way they do Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Why people behave the way they do - Assignment Example The author begins by highlighting the influence that leaders have on the people they work with, mainly because their actions have influence on the output of an organization (Clawson, 2001). More so, the article is intended to provide an analysis of different characters of people so as to offer a greater level of predictability for the people we work with. According to Clawson (2001), the attention and treatment that infants receive within their first six months of life have great influence on their personalities. For instance, if the persons in charge of taking care of the immediate needs of such children are incapable of meeting them satisfactorily or on time, a child is likely to develop a negative personality. In such a case, the individual may grow up trying to fill a gap in their expectations that developed when they were not well attended to. On the other end, a person whose needs were actively and dutifully met during this critical phase of their lives will develop warmer relations with other people, and this is likely to show strongly later in life, including at the work place. This view is shared by Kuppens (2009), who noted that personality differentiation and variability are direct products of the experiences one goes through from birth. Therefore, parts of our personalities are the product of how well we were attended to in our formative years. Various other factors contribute significantly to whom we become; which is strongly reflected in what we do. For instance, genetic makeup identifies an individual to a specific lineage. Clawson (2001) noted that on top of the physical characteristics we inherit, we also inherit bio-chemical balances and emotional tendencies. Emotional regulation (and dysregulation) is controlled by bio-chemical balance (for instance hormones) is what contributes to what we do, how we respond to others, and, by extension, how other people